osirus: (Default)
[personal profile] osirus
Because clearly, people didn't already have enough of a fascination with boobs. (totally work-safe)

Gives a whole new meaning to the term jug band, eh?

Date: 2005-10-13 09:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrvoid.livejournal.com
This is, and I don't mean to exaggerate, the single greatest idea in the history of mankind.

Date: 2005-10-13 09:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lostsilmaril.livejournal.com
So... that means that we can take control of a woman's breasts... remotely...

Date: 2005-10-13 09:47 pm (UTC)

But, Wait, There's More!

Date: 2005-10-13 11:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrparx.livejournal.com
"BT Laboratories' analyst Ian Pearson said flexible plastic electronics would sit inside the breast. A signal would be relayed to headphones, while the device would be controlled by Bluetooth using a panel on the wrist."

This is the flaw in the masterplan. The breasts should -BE- the headphones, and B(r)estBuy should hire "soundmodels" so one could try it before one buys it.

Or, conversely, I need to get out more.

Best,
Mr. P.

Date: 2005-10-14 12:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] minyan.livejournal.com
So we start measuring virtual memory in megatits?

And the chip plays what —
The hills are alive with the sound of music . . .

(In cell-phone chipmunk tones, of course. Imagine the before-theatre announcements?)

Date: 2005-10-14 02:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wellstar.livejournal.com
And thus we say ta-ta to iPod minis...

Date: 2005-10-14 03:30 am (UTC)
ext_3579: I'm still not watching supernatural. (Pretty in pink)
From: [identity profile] the-star-fish.livejournal.com
But ... what if one doesn't need breast implants?

::is sad::

Date: 2005-10-14 02:09 pm (UTC)
ext_3579: I'm still not watching supernatural. (Ani-me)
From: [identity profile] the-star-fish.livejournal.com
Probably because we've never met ... I am somewhat gifted already in the boobage department.

(And by "somewhat" I mean "a lot.")

(And by "gifted" I mean "man, these things get heavy sometimes.")

And thus no iboobs for me.

Date: 2005-10-14 02:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heef.livejournal.com
It was meant tongue-in-cheek - the old "the bigger, the better" stereotype that most men eventually grow out of. :)

I Got It...

Date: 2005-10-14 03:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrparx.livejournal.com
And had to wipe coffee off my screen after I read it. Because I'm ALWAYS looking for the joke. Thanks for the laugh.

Best,
Mr. P.

boobs

Date: 2005-10-16 08:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] funkyrj.livejournal.com
Do we get to program the music?

praeteritio

Date: 2005-10-16 08:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] osirusbrisbane.livejournal.com
I'm sorry, I'd love to reply to your comment, but I promised myself I wouldn't say anything about turning "selection knobs".

Re: praeteritio

Date: 2005-10-17 08:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrparx.livejournal.com
That's some restraint, there.

-parx

Date: 2005-10-17 05:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lizzyxo.livejournal.com
they should have iSack for boys.
Page generated Dec. 25th, 2025 12:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios